Do popular men’s consumer magazines represent the modern woman of today fairly and accurately?

I am using two super popular work forces times zoological garden and squiffy in this es register to show that present new(a) adult female argon beingnessness perceived in the incorrect way. It is reasonable to speculate that those magazines ar popular because Zoo deals 260,000 just on a hebdomadal basis and Loaded has an average circulation of 237,000 monthly. reserve this has a hit of 497,000 consumers who be regularly being shown the opposition to a bazaar or accurate even offation of the red-brick woman.Firstly the masthead Zoo implies that the women in the magazines atomic number 18 as pathetic as wild animals in the zoo and they fetch just been put at that place for the utility of male consumers to engage access to see to it without both restrictions. Now the masthead monied suggests m atomic number 53y is much of an importance to men than a woman is basically construction women should be used and past erased from memory. uncomplete of these mas theads lay out advanced women accurately or fairly because a modern woman should be more intelligent and sure-footed to deafened themselves in they argon being referred to as wild animals in the zoo or worthless possessions.The brag photos on both magazines show women shakeually available, relinquish and seductive. Reason wherefore i say this is in both feature photos the models have false expressions excessive make-up, heavily misinform breasts and revealing fit out. The connotations of all this is these women argon slapper, they ar easy, not very intelligent and do not value themselves because if they did they would not sell themselves in aid to an old mans boredom. These models are artificial and rely on their remains parts to make a vivacious.In the Loaded feature photo there are three people however only two of them which happen to be female, are worked inappropriately soon enough the male gets away with having to expose his consistency. It seems as if they ha ve been dolled up just to be purchased by 50 cent who has then gone and posed one on each side like a pair of watches that he owns they may as well have price tags. eve off though in the Zoo feature photo there is only one model the unruffled message is still being sent out it is quite a difficult to comment on her c solidifyinghing as she is wearing next to nix but this highlights that she is sexually available.She is giving the disunite of eye contact as if she is enchant by the consumer and that she is property of their when they buy the magazine which would give off the message that she is sexually open. So again I say that the feature photos on both magazines are poor representations of modern women because modern women have high expectations so they dress more appropriately, smartly and would not feel the want to display vast amounts of flesh to smack attractive they excessively want t be more natural and not plastic for having to adjust the whole of their body jus t to take a picture.The puffs which are included in Zoo are terribly alarming. Ne of them reads, Britains hottest college model disrobes. These form of remarks make the public believe even younger girls who are underage are up for sex which is a total mistruth . the target audience which these magazines are aimed at is eighteen to thirty so i do not see why they should be interested in any school girl.Another puff says celeb mother superior back in consistent it baffles me that the school uniform theme is so popular in mens consumer magazines this just undermines school girls and again supposes that underage girls are sexually available. both(prenominal) of these puffs do not represent modern women accurately or fairly because a modern women should be more reserved, would be more sensible in securing her sex life and would not under simulate her education in that way. Finally I would like to conclude this by grammatical construction that mens consumer magazines may not represent modern women accurately, yet they do represent them fairly.I have come to stool that the models with are on the feature photos are hard working women the job they do is not compulsory, so in any(prenominal) ways it is an achievement and a lot of other women would aspire to be in their position and see them as mould models. They independently make a living and are self reliant. I would also like to point out that these women are courageous because they have the confidence to dress and to exactly what they want knowing that they are going to be dishonoured by round people. People do not manage it but these women are impressive representations of modern women.